MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156817850 · doi:10.1517/13543776.16.7.977

TRPV1 antagonists: a survey of the patent literature

2006· article· en· W2156817850 on OpenAlexaff
Donald J. Kyle, Laykea Tafesse

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicIon Channels and Receptors
Canadian institutionsPurdue Pharma (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRPV1PharmacologyMedicineClinical trialComputational biologyBusinessBiologyReceptorInternal medicineTransient receptor potential channel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent cloning of vanilloid receptor 1 (TRPV1) from multiple species, together with published results showing efficacy of TRPV1 antagonists in animal models of pain, has led to substantial patenting activity by several major pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions. This review is focused on the patent literature related to non-peptidic small molecule TRPV1 antagonists. A total of 105 published patent applications claiming TRPV1 antagonists are reviewed during 2002 – 2005. Human clinical trials using TRPV1 antagonists are in the earliest stages and interest in this approach toward the treatment of various pain conditions appears to be growing annually.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic PatentsSame topicIon Channels and ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207