MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156822856

Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage, Collateralizable Assets, dan Investment Opportunity Set terhadap Kebijakan Dividen (Studi Empiris : Bursa Efek Indonesia 2010-2013)

2015· article· en· W2156822856 on OpenAlex
Alifa Agustiana Putri

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmiah Universitas Bakrie · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessLeverage (statistics)Financial systemMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

R. (2011). Cara Cerdas Menguasai EVIEWS. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Al-Malkawi, H.A.N. (2007). Determinants of Dividend Policy in Jordan. An application of Tobit Model. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 23 (2), 44-70 Ang, R. (1997). Buku Pintar : Pasar Modal Indonesia (The Intelligent Guide to Indonesia Capital Market). Jakarta: Mediasoft Indonesia. Ardiyos. (2004). Kamus Besar Akuntansi. Jakarta: Citra Harta Prima. Arfan, M. a Maywindlan, T. (2013). Pengaruh arus kas bebas, collateralizable assets, dan kebijakan utang terhadap kebijakan dividen pada Perusahaan yang terdaftar di Jakarta Islamic Index. Jurnal Telaah a Riset Akuntansi, 6 (2), 194-208. Arief, A.B. a Wibowo. (2003). Akuntansi Keuangan Dasar 2. Jakarta: Grasindo. Arifanto, N.I. a Prasetiono. (2009). Agency cost terhadap dividend payout ratio. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro, 9 (2), 141-157. Auditta, I.G., Sutrisno, a Achsin, M. (2014). Pengaruh agency cost terhadap kebijakan dividen. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 12, (2), 284-294. Brigham, E.F. a Houston, J.F., (2004). Dasar-dasar Manajemen Keuangan. (edisi kesepuluh). (Ali Akbar Yulianto, Penerjemah). Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat. Fahmi, I. (2014). Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan dan Pasar Modal. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media. Fauz, A. a Rosidi (2007). Pengaruh Aliran Kas Bebas, Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kepemiliikan Institusional, Kebijakan Utang, dan Collateral Asset terhadap Kebijakan Dividen. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 8 (2), 259-267. Gaver, J.J a Gaver, K.M., (1993). Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16, 125-160. Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometrics Analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Gujarati, D. (2006). Dasar-dasar Ekonometrika. Jakarta: Erlangga. Hagstrom, R.G. (1995). The Warren Buffett Way. Canada: John Wiley a Sons, Inc. Halim, J.J. (2013). Faktor-Faktor yang mempengaruhi kebijakan dividen Perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada sektor industri barang konsumsi periode 2008-2011. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya, 2 (2). Handayani, D. (2010). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi dividend payout ratio pada Perusahaan manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2005-2007. Skripsi. Universitas Diponegoro. Hartono, R.A. a Atahau, A.D.R. (2007). Analisis Interdependensi Insider Ownership. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 13 (1), 1-19. Haryetti a Ekayanti, A. (2012). Pengaruh profitabilitas, investment opportunity set, dan pertumbuhan Perusahaan LQ-45 yang terdaftar di BEI. Jurnal Akuntansi, 20 (3). Hery. (2013). Rahasia Pembagian Dividend a Tata Kelola Perusahaan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Gava Media. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2006). Standar Akuntansi Keuangan. Per 1 April 2006. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Institute for Economic and Financial Research (ECFIN). (2011), Indonesian Capital Market Directory (ICMD) 2010. Jakarta: PT Bursa Efek Jakarta. Institute for Economic and Financial Research (ECFIN). (2012), Indonesian Capital Market Directory (ICMD) 2011. Jakarta: PT Bursa Efek Jakarta. Institute for Economic and Financial Research (ECFIN). (2013), Indonesian Capital Market Directory (ICMD) 2012. Jakarta: PT Bursa Efek Jakarta. Institute for Economic and Financial Research (ECFIN). (2014), Indonesian Capital Market Directory (ICMD) 2013. Jakarta: PT Bursa Efek Jakarta. Jensen, M.C. a Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), 305-360. Juma'h, A.H. a Pacheco, C.J.O. (2008). The financial factors influencing cash dividend policy: A sample of U.S. manufacturing companies. Inter Metro Business Journal, 4 (2). Kallapur, S. a Trombley, M.A. (2001). The Investment Opportunity Set : Determinants, Consequences, and Measurements. Managerial Finance, 27, 3-15. Keown, A.J., Martin, J.D., Scott, D.F., a Petty, J.W. (2002), Manajemen Keuangan : Prinsip-prinsip dan Aplikasi (edisi kesembilan). (Chaerul D. Djakman dan Dwi Sulisyorini, Penerjemah). Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Kumar, J. (2006). Corporate Governance and Dividend Policy in India. Journal of Eemerging Market Finance, 5 (5), 15-58 Lamsihar, E.M.H. (2011). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kebijakan dividen pada industri barang konsumsi di BEI. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sumatera Utara. Liu, S. a Hu, Y. (2005). Empirical analysis of cash dividend payment in chinese listed companies. Nature and Science, 3 (1). Marlina, L. a Danica, C. (2009). Analisis pengaruh cash position, debt to equity ratio, dan return on assets terhadap dividend payout ratio. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 2 (1), 1-6. Marpaung, E.I. a Hadianto, B. (2009). Pengaruh profitabilitas dan kesempatan investasi terhadap kebijakan dividen. Jurnal Akuntansi, 1 (1), 70-84. Melani, A. (2013). Tak bagi dividen, BEI minta penjelasan emiten. February 1, 2013. http://pasarmodal.inilah.com/read/detail/1953627/tak-bagi-dividen-bei-minta-penjelasan-emiten Myers, S. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 145-175. Nizar, M.A. a Syahrul. (2011). Kamus Akuntansi. Jakarta: H. Ruswoyo Solekhan Pujiastuti, T. (2008). Agency cost terhadap kebijakan dividen pada Perusahaan manufaktur dan jasa yang go public di Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 12 (2), 183-197. Putri, D.A. (2013). Pengaruh invesment opportunity set, kebijakan utang, dan ukuran Perusahaan terhadap kebijakan dividen. Jurnal Manajemen, 2 (2) Rachmad, A.N. a Muid, D. (2013). Pengaruh struktur kepemilikan, leverage, dan return on assets (ROA) terhadap kebijakan dividen (Studi empiris pada Perusahaan nonkeuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 2 (3), 1-11. Robinson, J. (2006). Corporate finance in developing countries: An analysis of dividend policy among publicy listed firms in Jamaica. Savings and Development, 30 (2). Saraswati, E. (2007). Value relevance dari earnings dan cash flow : Pengujian dikaitkan dengan siklus hidup Perusahaan. TEMA, 8 (1) Sari, N.I. (2012). Selama 10 tahun, 55 emiten tak pernah bagi dividen. November 26, 2012. http://www.merdeka.com/uang/selama-10-tahun-55-emiten-tak-pernah-bagi-hasil.html Sari, N.I. (2013). Tak bagi dividen ke pemegang saham, emiten dikenakan denda. February 22, 2013. http://www.merdeka.com/uang/tak-bagi-dividen-ke-pemegang-saham-emiten-dikenakan-denda.html Sari, R.F. (2010). Analisis pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial, kebijakan utang, profitabilitas, ukuran Perusahaan, dan kesempatan investasi terhadap kebijakan dividen. Skripsi. Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta. Sartono, A. (2000). Ringkasan Teori Manajemen Keuangan; Soal dan Penyelesaiannya. Yogyakarta: BPFE. SAS Support Communities. (n.d). Best AIC. November 30, 2012. https://communities.sas.com/message/146361 Suaidi, A. (1994). Akuntansi Keuangan Menengah (edisi kelima). Yogyakarta: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu YKPN. Sugiyono. (2004). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta. Suharli, M. (2007). Pengaruh profitability dan investment opportunity set terhadap kebijakan dividen tunai dengan likuiditas sebagai variabel penguat. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 9 (1), 9-17. Suharli, M. a Oktorina, M. (2005). Memprediksi tingkat pengembalian investasi pada equity securities melalui rasio profitabilitas, likuiditas, dan hutang pada Perusahaan publik di Jakarta. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 8, 288-296. Titman, S. a Wessles, R. (1988). The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice. The Journal of Finance, 43 (1), 1-19 Umar, H. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka. Unit Pengembangan Fakultas Ekonomika Universitas Diponegoro. (2011). Modul Eviews 6. Semarang: Author. Verbeek, M. (2000). A Guide to Modern Econometrics. England: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. Wira, D. (2013). Jurus Cuan Investasi Saham (edisi ketiga). Jakarta: Exceed Wibowo a Arif, A. (2003). Pengantar Akuntansi II Ikhtisar Teori dan Soal-soal. Jakarta: Grasindo. Widarjono, A. (2007). Ekonometrika Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Ekononisia FE UII

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it