MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156873202 · doi:10.1093/nar/gks903

Regulation of human Dicer by the resident ER membrane protein CLIMP-63

2012· article· en· W2156873202 on OpenAlexafffund
Geneviève Pépin, Marjorie Perron, Patrick Provost

Bibliographic record

VenueNucleic Acids Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDicerBiologyCell biologyEndoplasmic reticulummicroRNARibonuclease IIIMessenger RNAMolecular biologyRNARNA interferenceGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ribonuclease Dicer plays a central role in the microRNA pathway by catalyzing the formation of microRNAs, which are known to regulate messenger RNA (mRNA) translation. In order to improve our understanding of the molecular context in which Dicer functions and how it is regulated in human cells, we sought to expand its protein interaction network by employing a yeast two-hybrid screening strategy. This approach led to the identification and characterization of cytoskeleton-linking endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane protein of 63 kDa (CLIMP-63) as a novel Dicer-interacting protein. CLIMP-63 interacts with Dicer to form a high molecular weight complex, which is electrostatic in nature, is not mediated by RNA and is catalytically active in pre-microRNA processing. CLIMP-63 is required for stabilizing Dicer protein and for optimal regulation of a reporter gene coupled to the 3' untranslated region of HMGA2 mRNA in human cells. Interacting with a portion of the luminal domain of CLIMP-63 and within minutes of its synthesis, our results suggest that Dicer transits through the ER, is glycosylated and can be secreted by cultured human cells with CLIMP-63. Our findings define CLIMP-63 as a novel protein interactor and regulator of Dicer function, involved in maintaining Dicer protein levels in human cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNucleic Acids ResearchSame topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207