Plasma melatonin and insulin‐like growth factor‐1 responses to dim light at night in dairy heifers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of dim (5, 10 and 50 1x) light at night on night plasma melatonin level (NML) and night plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) level was determined in 12 prepubertal Holstein heifers (245 +/- 16 days age) using a 4 x 4 Latin Square design with 14-day treatment and 14-day recovery periods. Blood samples were collected at 23:00 hr (prior to the 8 hr night treatment which commenced at mid-night) on days 0, 3 and 13, and throughout the night at 01:00, 02:00, 03:00, 04:00, 06:00 and 08:00 hr on days 1, 4 and 14 of treatment. Plasma was analysed by radioimmunoassay for melatonin (all samples) and IGF-1 (samples for day 14, 04:00 hr only). Treatment (P = 0.03) and treatment x time (P = 0.02) were significant for NML. Exposure to 50 lx suppressed NML by 50% during the initial 2 hr of the night, but not thereafter. Exposure to 5 and 10 lx had no effect on NML. The NML response to 50 lx was found on all treatment days studied (treatment x time x day; P = 0.99). There was no treatment effect on plasma IGF-1 level (P = 0.89), but plasma IGF-1 level was higher (P = 0.001) during period 4. Plasma IGF-1 level and NML tended (P = 0.10) to be negatively correlated. Light intensities of 10 lx or less appear safe for use at night in dairy barns where darkness is recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".