Design and Deployment of an Integrated Instrumentation System in a Monitoring Well at the Penn West CO<sub>2</sub>-EOR Pilot, Alberta, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the Penn West CO2-EOR Pilot Monitoring Project initiated in Western Canada in early March, 2005. Monitoring the Penn West CO2-EOR Pilot Project presents an opportunity to apply, develop, and enhance our knowledge of the CO2-EOR storage processes and especially to develop monitoring technologies that will make this technology to mitigating greenhouse effects predictable, environmentally friendly, sound and robust. In particular the paper will focus on the completion of a dedicated observation well within the pilot area containing a geophone string, multiple pressure and temperature sensors and two downhole fluid recovery systems (FRS) — all cemented in place at 1600 m depth. These tools represent an opportunity for both short- and long-term monitoring by vertical seismic profiling (VSP), passive seismic, pressure, temperature, and geochemical monitoring. Synthesis of this information will provide the basis for recommendations regarding the deployment of downhole technology in observation wells used for the monitoring and verification of CO2 movement. This paper concludes with a discussion of these aspects of the project and will provide valuable insight for the many current projects and the professional community considering the deployment of sophisticated multi-instrument strings in field demonstration projects of CO2 storage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".