Resolution of the Human Sex Hormone-binding Globulin Dimer Interface and Evidence for Two Steroid-binding Sites per Homodimer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) transports sex steroids in the blood. It functions as a homodimer, but there is little information about the topography of its dimerization domain, and its steroid binding stoichiometry is controversial. The prevailing assumption is that each homodimeric SHBG molecule contains a single steroid-binding site at the dimer interface. However, crystallographic analysis of the amino-terminal laminin G-like domain of human SHBG has shown that the dimerization and steroid-binding sites are distinct and that both monomers within a homodimeric complex are capable of binding steroid. To validate our crystallographic model of the SHBG homodimer, we have used site-directed mutagenesis to create SHBG variants in which single amino acid substitutions (V89E and L122E) were introduced to produce steric clashes at critical positions within the proposed dimerization domain. The resulting dimerization-deficient SHBG variants contain a steroid-binding site with an affinity and specificity indistinguishable from wild-type SHBG. Moreover, when equalized in terms of their monomeric subunit content, dimerization-deficient and wild-type SHBGs have essentially identical steroid binding capacities. These data indicate that both subunits of the SHBG homodimer bind steroid and that measurements of the molar concentration of SHBG homodimer in serum samples have been overestimated by 2-fold.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".