MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156974682 · doi:10.1145/1391469.1391511

Application-driven floorplan-aware voltage island design

2008· article· en· W2156974682 on OpenAlexaff
Dipanjan Sengupta, Resve Saleh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFloorplanVoltageComputer scienceIntegrated circuit layoutChipReduction (mathematics)Partition (number theory)System on a chipPower (physics)Parallel computingEmbedded systemElectronic engineeringIntegrated circuitEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among the different methods of reducing power for core-based system-on-chip (SoC) designs, the voltage island technique has gained in popularity. Assigning cores to the different supply voltages and floorplanning to create contiguous voltage islands are the two important steps in the design process. We propose a new application-driven, floorplan-aware approach to voltage partitioning and island creation with the objective of reducing overall SoC power, area and runtime. Previous approaches used the voltage assignment table as the starting point for voltage island creation. In this paper, we present a technique to generate a voltage assignment table using dynamic programming. Next, we partition the cores into islands, based on the Power State Model (PSM) of the application, and connectivity information used in floorplanning. Finally, solutions are sent to the floorplanner in sequence until a valid solution is reached. Compared to previously reported techniques, a 10% reduction in power and 8% reduction in area are achieved using our approach, with an average runtime improvement of 2.3X.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207