Measurements of transmural strain variations by two dimensional ultrasound speckle tracking
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) is known to progress from the inner layers towards the epicardium. Since it is important to detect MI early, to prevent a negative remodeling process of the left ventricle (LV), the hypothesis of this study was that evaluation of layer-specific strains is feasible, and it will enable differentiation between subjects with large MI, small MI and normal LV. Methods: In this study a commercial speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) program was modified to measure the strains at three myocardial layers instead of for the total-wall-thickness. After a validation process by using software implemented phantoms, the commercial and modified programs were applied to echocardiography of 54 subjects. Results: The validation study results for 972 segments showed an agreement between the endocardial strains, manually measured by the commercial program, and automatically measured by the modified program. Finally, the algorithm was applied to scans of 15 normal subjects, 9 patients with small MI and to 6 patients with large MI. The results show that the strain elevated from the endocardium towards the epicardium for the normal and small MI groups, but not for the large MI group. Conclusions: In conclusion, the layer-specific STE method allows accurate analysis of the transmural variations of the strains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it