Endovascular Trapping of a Vertebral Artery Segment to Control PICA Origin Tearing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Iatrogenic perforation or rupture during aneurysm coiling can be difficult to manage and may lead to fatal bleeding. We describe a lifesaving technique of isolating the subarachnoid segment of the vertebral artery using two balloons to trap flow to a ruptured PICA aneurysm allowing time to coil the parent artery with the aneurysm. CASE: A 58-year-old woman presented with Hunt Hess Grade 3 subarachnoid hemorrhage due to a 3 mm left PICA aneurysm. During placement of the first coil, aneurysm perforation was noted. Despite conventional measures to manage the perforation (anticoagulation reversal, balloon inflation, placement of a second coil, and ventricular drain), contrast extravasation persisted after 45 minutes. A second balloon was positioned via the right vertebral artery at the right vertebrobasilar junction and inflated. The first balloon was pulled back, inflated, allowing trapping of the ruptured site. The aneurysm and adjacent vertebral segment were rapidly coiled to occlude the ruptured site under local flow arrest. The patient awoke with dysarthria, left-sided hemiparesis and dysphagia. CONCLUSION: Trapping an arterial segment with two balloons may help in the management of PICA origin aneurysm perforation refractory to medical and current endovascular strategies. This technique, while potentially lifesaving, may engender ischemic complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".