Combinatorial exploration of the catalytic site of a drug-resistant dihydrofolate reductase: creating alternative functional configurations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have applied a global approach to enzyme active site exploration, where multiple mutations were introduced combinatorially at the active site of Type II R67 dihydrofolate reductase (R67 DHFR), creating numerous new active site environments within a constant framework. By this approach, we combinatorially modified all 16 principal amino acids that constitute the active site of this enzyme. This approach is fundamentally different from active site point mutation in that the native active site context is no longer accounted for. Among the 1536 combinatorially mutated active site variants of R67 DHFR we created, we selected and kinetically characterized three variants with highly altered active site compositions. We determined that they are of high fitness, as defined by a complex function consisting jointly of catalytic activity and resistance to trimethoprim. The k(cat) and K(M) values were similar to those for the native enzyme. The favourable Delta(DeltaG) values obtained (ranging from -0.72 to -1.08 kcal/mol) suggest that, despite their complex mutational pattern, no fundamental change in the catalytic mechanism has occurred. We illustrate that combinatorial active site mutagenesis can allow for the creation of compensatory mutations that could not be predicted and thus provides a route for more extensive exploration of functional sequence space than is allowed by point mutation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it