MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157161648 · doi:10.1109/jsac.2004.829642

Topological Design Optimization of a Yottabit-Per-Second Lattice Network

2004· article· en· W2157161648 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalGroup for Research in Decision Analysis
FundersDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency
KeywordsComputer scienceTabu searchLattice (music)Agile software developmentTopology (electrical circuits)Network planning and designEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionNetwork topologyAlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceComputer networkMathematicsTelecommunicationsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the topological design of a yotta-bit-per-second (1yotta=10/sup 24/) multidimensional network. The YottaWeb is a recently proposed architecture based upon agile optical cores that provides fully meshed connectivity with direct optical paths between edge nodes that are electronically controlled. In order to arrange the edge nodes around the agile cores (ACs) into a suitable and efficient YottaWeb, one proposal is to create a multidimensional lattice structure of ACs. The problem of designing such a structure is highly combinatorial. In this paper, we present the problem, that we call nodal arrangement problem, and we propose a meta-search procedure based on Tabu and VNS to solve it. The performance of the algorithm is gauged using a set of randomly generated networks with different distribution of traffic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it