MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157191538 · doi:10.1002/mop.25902

A CMOS QPSK demodulator frontend for a PON ONU

2011· article· en· W2157191538 on OpenAlexaff
Fei Chen, Ryan Bespalko, Brian Frank

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGigabitDemodulationPhase-shift keyingElectronic engineeringPassive optical networkCMOSEngineeringElectrical engineeringIntermediate frequencyBroadbandBit error rateTelecommunicationsRadio frequencyPhysicsChannel (broadcasting)Wavelength-division multiplexingOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A quadrature phase‐shift keying (QPSK) demodulator frontend for a passive optical network (PON) optical network unit receiver fabricated in CMOS 0.13‐μm technology is presented. The frontend integrates a compact 5‐GHz ring quadrature voltage‐controlled oscillator (QVCO), two inductor‐less broadband mixers, and two second‐order LC ladder low‐pass filters. The broadband mixers operate with an input frequency between 2.5 and 7.5 GHz and with an input 1‐dB compression point of −5 dBm. Area‐saving design techniques are applied to lower the cost of the terminal receivers, because a competitive cost is a key requirement for the deployment of the PON access network. The frontend circuit presented achieves an area savings of more than 90% for the QVCO and mixers when compared with some published designs that can also fit the application. Measurement and simulation results are presented to verify that this frontend can be used to demodulate a QPSK signal with a data rate as high as 5 Gb/s, which is twice the downstream data rate of the current Gigabit PON standard. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 53:1056–1062, 2011; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/mop.25902

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207