MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157257597 · doi:10.1517/14656566.2012.686169

A review of olanzapine pamoate

2012· review· en· W2157257597 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Chue, James Chue

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlanzapineMedicineDeliriumSedationIncidence (geometry)Side effect (computer science)AnesthesiaSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Intensive care medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Olanzapine long-acting injection (OLAI), or olanzapine pamoate , is one of three second generation (SGA) antipsychotics now available in a long-acting formulation. OLAI is a microcrystalline salt of pamoic acid and olanzapine suspended in an aqueous solution that slowly dissociates into the separate components once injected intramuscularly (im) into gluteal muscle. AREAS COVERED: A systematic search of databases including PubMed, PsychInfo, and Embase was conducted using the keywords. Relevant articles were then hand searched and relevant websites (FDA, EMA, Eli Lilly, and NIH) were also reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: Efficacy has been demonstrated in the short term and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia with OLAI at doses of 150 - 300 mg every two weeks or 405 mg every four weeks. The overall side effect profile is similar to oral olanzapine. While injection site complications are mild, there is an incidence rate per injection of 0.07 % (incidence rate per patient of 1.4%) of post-injection delirium sedation syndrome (PDSS). This manifests as overdose-like symptoms which necessitates mandatory administration and continuous monitoring of OLAI by health care professionals for the first three hours in a suitable clinical facility. As a consequence, final regulatory approval was delayed and market release and clinical use have been limited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.289
GPT teacher head0.577
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on PharmacotherapySame topicHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsFrench-language works237,207