Caribou‐induced changes in species dominance of lichen woodlands: an analysis ofplant remains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plant communities in northern Quebec-Labrador, Canada have been severely grazed and trampled since the early 1980s by the increasingly large George River caribou herd (GRCH). To evaluate changes in species dominance associated with caribou disturbance, we compared past and present ground vegetation from 14 lichen woodlands. Plant remains from superficial organic horizons indicate that ground vegetation was largely dominated by lichens (especially Cladina) before the onset of caribou disturbance. In enlargments of aerial photos taken before 1975 (i.e., prior to maximum size of the GRCH), all sites were free of caribou trails and were dominated by a continuous lichen (Cladina) carpet. Principal components analysis showed that partial or complete destruction of the Cladina-dominated lichen carpet was the most striking change in ground vegetation. Severe trampling degraded superficial organic horizons, subsequently exposing mineral soil in heavily used sites. With reduced caribou activity in the 1990s, exposed ground was colonized by crustose lichens and Cladonia. Sites that faced severe grazing but light trampling were recolonized mainly by small podetia of Cladina stellaris sprouting from the lichen litter. However, patterns of post-caribou disturbance lichen succession differed from those of post-fire succession, because species from different successional stages are present at the same time in a stand and also because caribou can modify the successional trajectory at any time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".