Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 9th International Family Nursing Conference held from June 2 to June 5, 2009, in Reykjavik, Iceland, was the first time that the International Family Nursing Conference was held in Europe (see Table 1 for a summary of the history of the International Family Nursing Conferences). More than 471 participants from 32 countries enjoyed the unforgettable beauty of Iceland and the opportunity to network with family nursing colleagues. I am still on a “high” from this wonderful Iceland conference. It was superbly hosted and organized by Dr. Erla Svavarsdottir of the University of Iceland and her colleagues. From the keynote, plenaries, preconference workshops, and paper and poster sessions, I was thrilled to learn about the progress of family nursing in Iceland and the world and loved the opportunity to see dear colleagues and make new friends. Pictures from the conference are posted on the conference Web site: http://www.ifnc2009.com/. Several of the plenary addresses offered at the 9th International Family Nursing Conference will be published over the coming months in the Journal of Family Nursing. One of the plenaries about knowledge translation in family nursing (Leahey & Svavarsdottir, 2009) is included in this issue. A book of selected papers from the conference is planned. The distribution of conference participants includes the following:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".