THE RIEMANN–HILBERT APPROACH TO GLOBAL ASYMPTOTICS OF DISCRETE ORTHOGONAL POLYNOMIALS WITH INFINITE NODES
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we develop the Riemann–Hilbert approach to study the global asymptotics of discrete orthogonal polynomials with infinite nodes. We illustrate our method by concentrating on the Charlier polynomials [Formula: see text]. We first construct a Riemann–Hilbert problem Y associated with these polynomials and then establish some technical results to transform Y into a continuous Riemann–Hilbert problem so that the steepest descent method of Deift and Zhou ([8]) can be applied. Finally, we produce three Airy-type asymptotic expansions for [Formula: see text] in three different but overlapping regions whose union is the entire complex z-plane. When z is real, our results agree with the ones given in the literature. Although our approach is similar to that used by Baik, Kriecherbauer, McLaughlin and Miller ([3]), there are crucial differences in the details. For instance, our expansions hold in much bigger regions. Our results are completely new, and one of them answers a question raised in Bo and Wong ([4]). Asymptotic formulas are also derived for large and small zeros of the Charlier polynomials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it