Impacts of Diet on Thiamine Status of Lake Ontario American Eels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Lake Ontario–upper St. Lawrence River (LOUSL) population of American Eels Anguilla rostrata (hereafter, “eels”) was once one of the most important groups of the species but is now in a state of serious decline. Given that thiamine deficiency has been observed in almost all of the top predators in Lake Ontario, we assessed the potential that a diet‐induced thiamine deficiency associated with consumption of Alewives Alosa pseudoharengus could be involved. Muscle thiamine was measured in eels from throughout the LOUSL corridor and was compared with putative threshold effect levels established from the literature. Mirex concentrations were used to separate Lake Ontario‐resident eels from non‐Lake Ontario‐resident eels. Stable isotope analyses of eel muscle samples and potential prey, including Alewives, were combined with mixing model software to infer the diets consumed by Lake Ontario eels. Although residence in Lake Ontario was associated with a significant decline in muscle thiamine concentration, estimated Alewife consumption by eels was unexpectedly low. Instead, mixing model results indicated that crayfish and Round Goby Neogobius melanostomus were the major prey. Both taxa are known to contain thiaminase and have the potential to cause thiamine deficiency, but there are no reports of thiamine deficiency associated with Round Goby consumption, thus implicating crayfish. There was no recovery in thiamine levels prior to the initiation of oceanic migration. As a result, thiamine levels of Lake Ontario‐resident eels prior to migration were only slightly above putative threshold effect levels for pathological and behavioral effects in Japanese Eels Anguilla japonica, but this would require confirmation with American Eels. Since thiamine levels are expected to decline further during migration, additional effects on eel behavior, reproduction, and survival seem probable. Because of panmixia, such effects—when combined with the relatively high reproductive potential of Lake Ontario‐resident eels—may have consequences for the entire species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".