MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157336397 · doi:10.5194/angeo-28-861-2010

Relative O- and X-mode transmitted power from SuperDARN as it relates to the RRI instrument on ePOP

2010· article· en· W2157336397 on OpenAlexafffundabout
R. G. Gillies, G. C. Hussey, G. J. Sofko, H. G. James

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales Geophysicae · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsIonospherePhysicsGeophysicsRadarSubstormRadio propagationComputational physicsMagnetic fieldPolarGeologyMagnetosphereTelecommunicationsComputer scienceAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The Cascade Demonstrator Small-Sat and Ionospheric Polar Explorer (CASSIOPE) satellite is scheduled to be launched in 2010. On board this satellite will be a suite of eight scientific instruments comprising the enhanced Polar Outflow Probe (ePOP). One instrument is the Radio Receiver Instrument (RRI) which will be used to receive HF transmissions from various ground transmitters such as the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) array. Magnetoionic polarization and propagation theory have been used to model the relative power that SuperDARN delivers to the Ordinary (O) and Extraordinary (X) modes of propagation. These calculations have been performed for various frequencies in the SuperDARN transmitting band and for all five Canadian based SuperDARN radars. The geometry of the radars with respect to the background magnetic field results in the X-mode dominating the transmitted signal when the modelled wave propagates northward and is nearly perpendicular to the magnetic field lines. Other propagation directions (i.e., above or southwards of the radar) results in propagation which is anti-parallel to the magnetic field lines and an equal splitting of transmitted power between the O- and X-modes occurs. The modelling analysis shows that for either high transmitting frequencies or low ionospheric electron densities, the range of latitudes that signal will be received is quite large (up to ~90° of latitude). Also for these conditions, the range of elevations where the X-mode signal strongly dominates the O-mode signal will be apparent in the received signal. Conversely, for lower transmitting frequencies or higher ionospheric electron densities, the latitudinal range that signal will be received over is smaller. Here the X-mode-only band is not apparent in the received signal as both modes will be received with roughly equal power. These relative mode power calculations can be used to characterize the average electron density content in the ionosphere or provide a measure of relative absorption in the D- and E-regions when the satellite passes through the field-of-view of a SuperDARN radar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales GeophysicaeSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207