MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157368450 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2000.900416

Vascular tree extraction from MRA and power Doppler US image volumes

2002· article· en· W2157368450 on OpenAlexafffund
B.K.H. Lee, David G. Gobbi, T.M. Peters

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersMedical Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingUltrasoundTree (set theory)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionImage registrationDoppler ultrasoundRadiologyImage (mathematics)MedicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Image-guided neurosurgery procedures rely on the assumption that the brain is a rigid body for proper pre-operative image registration. However, the brain tissues typically shift prior to and during the procedures. Intra-operative ultrasound images may be used to identify the extent of brain shift and to correct the pre-operative magnetic resonance (MR) images. We propose to use the features of the vascular tree as common landmarks between the MR and ultrasound image volumes to properly update the pre-operative MR images. We present the preliminary results of a 3D method to extract the vascular tree from magnetic resonance angiogram and power Doppler ultrasound image volumes. The faces of a cubic region of interest are searched to measure the curvature of the vessel and to identify branches. The vascular tree is constructed by interpolating between the vessel points that are determined as the algorithm iterates through the data volume. Computer reproductions of the extracted skeleton correspond well to the vessels in magnetic resonance angiograms and in power Doppler ultrasound volumes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207