MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157387643

Analisis Kelayakan Investasi Pembangkit Tenaga Listrik di Lampung oleh Pln Ditinjau dari Aspek Keuangan

2015· article· id· W2157387643 on OpenAlex
Citra Chairunnisa

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmiah Universitas Bakrie · 2015
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryAgricultural sciencePhysicsEnvironmental scienceGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ANALISIS KELAYAKAN INVESTASI PEMBANGKIT TENAGA LISTRIK DI LAMPUNG OLEH PLN DITINJAU DARI ASPEK KEUANGAN Citra Dilla Chairunnisa ABSTRAK Pertumbuhan perekonomian Indonesia yang disertai dengan pertumbuhan penduduk dan tentunya harus ditunjang dengan peningkatan infrastruktur. PT PLN (Persero) menyadari akan adanya peningkatan kebutuhan listrik di masa yang akan datang, terutama di wilayah Sumatera. Penelitian ini menganalisis kelayakan investasi dan resiko dari studi kelayakan aspek yaitu, aspek keuangan dan non keuangan seperti aspek teknis, aspek pasar, aspek manajemen, serta aspek sosial dan lingkungan. Lama perhitungan didasari oleh umur proyek yaitu 30 tahun. Hasil Analisis aspek non finansial menunjukkan bahwa kedua pembangkit layak untuk dilaksanakan. Hasil perhitungan capital budgeting yang dilakukan menghasilkan nilai NPV sebesar Rp 6,5 triliun untuk PLTU dan Rp 5 triliun untuk PLTP. Selain itu, hasil analisis sensitivitas menunjukkan bahwa kedua pembangkit layak dilaksanakan ketika terjadi hal-hal diluar dugaan, seperti adanya kenaikan biaya produksi dan penurunan kapasitas produksi. Berdasarkan analisis aspek-aspek tersebut, PLTU lebih layak untuk dilaksanakan. PLTU terbukti lebih ramah lingkungan karena sudah ada teknologi yang dapat menanggulangi dampak limbah hasil operasi pembangkit, dengan nilai NPV yang lebih besar dari PLTP, dan masa balik modal yang lebih cepat, selain itu PLTU juga memiliki biaya operasional yang lebih murah. Kata Kunci: Investasi, Capital Budgeting, Studi Kelayakan Aspek, Aspek Keuangan, Aspek teknis, aspek pasar, aspek manajemen, aspek sosial dan lingkungan, Analisis Sensitivitas FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS OF GENERATING POWER INVESTMENT IN LAMPUNG BY PLN VIEWED FROM THE FINANCIAL ASPECTS Citra Dilla Chairunnisa ABSTRACT Indonesia's economic growth is accompanied by population growth and must be supported with improved infrastructure. PT PLN (Persero) aware of the increase in demand for electricity in the future, particularly in Sumatra. This study analyzes the feasibility of the investment and risks from the feasibility study aspect, specifically from financial and non-financial aspects financial and non-financial aspects such as technical aspects, market aspects, management aspects, and social and environmental aspects. The calculation is based on the 30 years long project life. The analysis results of non-financial aspects show that the two plants is feasible. Calculation results of capital budgeting showed NPV value of Rp 6,5 trillion for elecric steam power plants and Rp 5 trillion for geothermal power plants. In addition, the results of the sensitivity analysis showed that both plants feasible when things happen unexpected, such as the increase in production costs and a reduction in production capacity. Based on the analysis of these aspects, the electric steam power plant is more feasible. It proved to be more environmentally friendly as there is an existing technology that can cope with the impact of waste generation operating results, with greater NPV value than geothermal power plants, and a faster return on investment, furthermore the electric steam power plant also has a lower operating cost. Keywords: Investment, Capital Budgeting, Aspect Feasibility Study, Financial Aspects, Technical aspects, market aspects, management aspects, social and environmental aspects, Sensitivity Analysis DAFTAR PUSTAKA Brealey Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance , 7th Edition, MCGraw - Hill, 2004 Husein Umar, Research Methods in Finance and Banking , PT Gramedia Pustaka, Jakarta, 2000 Lawrence J. Gitman, Principles of Managerial Finance , 10th Edition, The Addison Wesley, 2003 Damodaran, Aswath., Investment Valuation – Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Assets , Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2002 PT PLN Persero., Rencana Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik 2006 – 2015,. Januari 2006 Makmun dan Abdurahman., Dampak Kenaikan Tarif Dasar Listrik Terhadap Konsumsi Listrik Dan Pendapatan Masyarakat , Jurnal Keuangan dan Moneter, Volume 6 Nomor 2, Desember 2003 Mardiyah, A. A. 2002. Pengaruh Informasi Asimetri dan Disclousure terhadap Cost of Equity Capital. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, Vol. 5, No. 2, Mei, hal 229-256 Utami, Wiwik. 2005. “Pengaruh Manajemen Laba terhadap Biaya Modal Ekuitas (Studi pada Perusahaan Publik Sektor Manufaktur)”. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VIII, Solo, 15 – 16 September: 100-116. Agus Danar dan Heru Subiyantoro, Pengaruh Sistem Perpajakan Terhadap Keputusan Investasi Proyek Panasbumi , Jurnal Keuangan dan Moneter Volume 5 Nomor 2, Desember 2003 Departemen Energi Dan Sumber Daya Mineral., Pohon Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2003 Tentang Panas Bumi ., http://www.setjen.esdm.go.id/prokum/pohon_uu/PohonUU%20Panasbumi.doc Badan Pengkajian Ekonomi, Keuangan, dan Kerjasama Internasional ., Kajian Kebijakan Insentif Fiskal Untuk Mendorong Investasi Di Sektor Ketenagalistrikan., Januari 2006 Gipe, Paul., Coal’s High Environmental & Social Cost in Ontario., http://www.wind-works.org/articles/OntarioCostofCoalStudyReview.html Departemen Keuangan RI dan Center for Energy and Power Studies., Kajian Dampak Perubahan Trend Penggunaan Listrik pada Sektor Industri., http://www.fiskal.depkeu.go.id/bapekki/kajian.asp?kajian=1010000 Dr. Hardiv Harris Situmeang., Permasalahan Strategis PLN., World Energy Council, 2004

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it