MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157424884 · doi:10.1109/tbme.2009.2028655

Stochastic Modeling of Normal and Tumor Tissue Microstructure for High-Frequency Ultrasound Imaging Simulations

2009· article· en· W2157424884 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad I. Daoud, James C. Lacefield

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHigh frequency ultrasoundUltrasoundUltrasonic imagingMicrostructureBiomedical engineeringUltrasound imagingMedical imagingMaterials scienceAcousticsComputer sciencePhysicsMedicineArtificial intelligenceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-frequency (20-60 MHz) ultrasound images of preclinical tumor models are sensitive to changes in tissue microstructure that accompany tumor progression and treatment responses, but the relationships between tumor microanatomy and high-frequency ultrasound backscattering are incompletely understood. This paper introduces a 3-D microanatomical model in which tissue is treated as a population of stochastically positioned spherical cells consisting of a spherical nucleus surrounded by homogeneous cytoplasm. The model is used to represent the microstructure of both healthy mouse liver and an experimental liver metastasis that are analyzed using 4 ',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole- and hematoxylin and eosin-stained histology specimens digitized at 20 x magnification. The spatial organization of cells is controlled in the model by a Gibbs-Markov point process whose parameters are tuned to maximize the similarity of experimental and simulated tissue microstructure, which is characterized using three descriptors of nuclear spatial arrangement adopted from materials science. The model can accurately reproduce the microstructure of the relatively homogeneous healthy liver and the average cell clustering observed in the experimental metastasis, but is less effective at reproducing the spatial heterogeneity of the experimental metastasis. The model provides a framework for computational investigations of the effects of individual microstructural and acoustic properties on high-frequency backscattering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringSame topicCell Image Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207