CROSS-LINKED POLYHEMOGLOBIN-SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE-CATALASE SUPPLIES OXYGEN WITHOUT CAUSING BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER DISRUPTION OR BRAIN EDEMA IN A RAT MODEL OF TRANSIENT GLOBAL BRAIN ISCHEMIA-REPERFUSION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In strokes, myocardial infarctions, severe sustained hemorrhagic shock, and donor organs, inadequate blood supply results in lack of oxygen to the tissue (ischemia). If ischemia is sustained, reperfusion with the needed oxygen can result in tissue injury (ischemia-reperfusion injury) due to formation of reactive oxygen species. We are studying an oxygen-carrying solution with anitoxidant activity formed by cross-linking hemoglobin, superoxide dismutase, and catalase to form PolyHb-SOD-CAT. The present report studies its effect on the blood-brain barrier and cerebral edema when used in a transient global brain ischemia-reperfusion rat model. We compare this solution to sham-control, oxygenated saline, stroma-free hemoglobin (SF-Hb), polymerized hemoglobin (PolyHb), and a mixture of SF-Hb, SOD, and CAT in free solution. The results show that the cross-linked PolyHb-SOD-CAT solution, unlike the other solutions, can supply oxygen to ischemic tissues without causing reperfusion injury in the transient global brain ischemia-reperfusion model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".