Periventricular brain injury, visual motion processing, and reading and spelling abilities in children who were extremely low birthweight
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Among children born at extremely low birthweight (ELBW: < 1000 g at birth) there is an association between the presence of periventricular brain injury (PVBI) and lowered performance on tests of reading and spelling ability. The present study was designed to determine if this association might be related to underlying dysfunction in the subcortical magnocellular visual pathway or its cortical targets in the dorsal stream, a prediction motivated by the magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Thirty-five ELBW children were divided into two groups based upon the presence or absence of PVBI (no PVBI, n = 11; PVBI, n = 24). The performance of these two groups was compared to that of a group of healthy full term children (n = 12) on a motion-defined form recognition task believed to tap into the functioning of the magnocellular pathway and/or the dorsal stream. ELBW children did, in fact, show a striking impairment on this task, with 71% of the sample performing at a level more than three standard deviations below the mean of full term controls. Surprisingly, their difficulties were not found to be related to either the presence of brain injury (verified by neonatal cranial ultrasound) or to problems with reading or spelling. An association was documented, however, between difficulties with motion processing and performance on several subtests of the Performance IQ scale of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. This latter finding is consistent with our earlier suggestion that magnocellular pathway/dorsal stream dysfunction may underlie problems with visuospatial and visuomotor performance in this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".