Melanonychia striata in Chinese children and adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is considerable racial variation in the occurrence of melanonychia striata. The prevalence of melanonychia striata in the Chinese population is not known. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of melanonychia striata in a Chinese population of patients. METHODS: Two thousand, four hundred and fifty-seven Chinese patients attending an Asian medical clinic were examined for the presence of melanonychia striata in a cross-sectional prevalence survey. The examinations were carried out as part of the routine medical care provided to these patients. Patients of mixed racial background were excluded. The fingernails and toenails of each patient were examined, and the presence or absence of melanonychia striata, the anatomic distribution of the lesion, and the age and sex of the patient were recorded. RESULTS: Melanonychia striata was not detected in patients aged less than 20 years. The condition was present in 0.6% of patients aged between 20 and 29 years. Thereafter, the prevalence increased gradually to 1.7% in patients aged 50 years and over. There was a significant relationship between age and the presence of melanonychia striata (chi(2) = 141, P < 0.01). There was no significant sex-related difference in the age-specific prevalence (P > 0.05). The thumbs were most frequently affected, followed by the index fingers (P < 0.001). The condition was bilateral in 40% of cases. None of the patients had involvement of more than two digits. CONCLUSION: Melanonychia striata is uncommon in Chinese individuals, especially in those aged under 20 years. The male to female ratio is approximately equal. The thumbs are most frequently affected and the condition is often bilateral.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".