The relationship between secondary school students' posture disorders and shyness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IntroductionAlthough, toady's machinery life has brought about notable industrial and technological advances and well-being for human beings and provides them with valuable services, it is followed by various disadvantages. The most fundamental disadvantage is the replacement of machine as a muscular power which underlies lack of movement and fatness. Besides these factors, the false pattern of sitting, standing, walking and carrying objects, wearing improper dressing and clothes, disease, inheritance, job positions, culture and anthropometry may reduce growth rate and make disorders in growth. Disorder and weakness in growth may followed by posture disorders and one may miss his optimum body posture. These weaknesses weaken automatically the other organs of body such as blood circulation and respiratory systems. Nowadays, in developed countries comprehensive and precise programs have been designed in order to define people the good physical posture, so that authorities of industrials and manufactures of required things such as table, chair, sofa, clothes, etc. consider observing scientific standards around physical posture as their absolute priority. This is as an importance of human's physical posture. The quality of body posture in an unconscious action and childhood and teens obtained body posture remains nearly unchanged in the other words, since these children are growing up and their epiphyses are soft and flexible and physical activities and sport can correct and form the disorders and abnormalities of their body, so it is highly important to know the students' body posture and provide them with physical activities to strengthen their body and remove any possible physical abnormalities during the sensitive period of growing, because if such disorders are not prevented and corrected, some secondary disorders will be generated in other parts of the body. Hence, knowing and studying common reasons and factors of abnormalities and disorders of students seem an inevitable necessity.Many studies have shown that early knowing spine disorders (scoliosis, kyphosis, hyperlordosis, shoulder asymmetry, pelvic obliquity) which are prevalence in childhood, may prevent their advancing and appearing serious transformations (Dickson.RA, 1895; Dvonch V.M, et al., 1990; Ferris.B, , et al., 1988; Hansen.TB, 1994;Lehner.JT, 1990).In a screening plan of schools which is done on 316.000 students in Delaware of U.S.A from 1962 to 1975, it was shown that prevalence of scoliosis was 0.19% which was significantly less than results of Dr.Schandes and other related studies in northern American. Another study conducted on 14.900 children in Montreal, Canada showed 1.6% prevalence of higher than 10 degrees. A similar study conducted in Scotland showed 1.3 per thousand in children younger than 8 years-old and 1.7 per thousand in children older than 8 years-old. In early 1970s, Lancetin performed a great screening program on 1.5 million people in Minnesota, and finally evaluated scoliosis prevalence as 1.1% (Dvonch V.M, et al., 1990; Yawn.BP, et al., 2000). Statistical results of some countries are: Japan: 1.92%; Greek: 2.7%; Southern Africa: 1.66%; Sweden: 1.9%; Finland: 4.1% Denmark: 14.3% (Goldberg.J, 1995; Grossman.TW, et al., 1995; Sugita.K, 2000; Willner.S, et al., 1982).In a study conducted on 4.975 eleven-years-old children (2.588 boys; 2.387 girls) in Netherlands in 1992 showed a strong disorder prevalence of girls as 10.6% and 7.1% for boys (Hazebroek- Kampschreur.AA, et al., 1992). Limited studies showed the scoliosis prevalence for 15-years-old girls as 4 per thousand and 1 per thousand for 9-years-old girls and 9 per thousand for 11-15 years-old boys (EbrahimAstaneh.M, 1997; NazmAra.Sh, 1993).MethodThis study is a descriptive-analytical that was done in a field method. Also, regarding the time duration, conducting the research is cross-sectional and practical according to the obtained results indicating posture abnormalities in lower and upper organs of students and their relation to shyness. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".