Optimizing pediatric venipuncture: ensuring successful blood sample collection with minimal stress and pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development (CHILD) study is a multicenter prospective birth cohort study designed to examine genetic and environmental factors related to the development of childhood asthma, allergies, and atopic dermatitis. The CHILD study events include the collection of blood samples at ages 1 and 5 years for all subjects. Blood collection is a critical aspect of the CHILD study, and all the following factors require thoughtful consideration: (a) optimizing the success rate of blood collection to ensure scientific integrity; (b) recognizing and relieving stress and pain during the pediatric venipuncture process; and (c) retaining subjects in this longitudinal study. At the Vancouver site of the CHILD study, we reviewed and compared current topical anesthetic creams used for pediatric venipuncture, specifically Ametop Gel (tetracaine hyrdrochloride gel 4%) versus EMLA (eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%). We conducted regular in-service training to ensure all members of the study team were informed and educated in understanding the importance of collecting the blood sample and dealing with pediatric populations at different developmental stages. Training also addressed parental anxiety related to the procedure and strategies to establish rapport and trust were shared. Finally, we developed a repertoire of comfort and distraction techniques to support the child, the parent, and the phlebotomist. We used quantitative and qualitative approaches to assess outcomes, including the number of blood samples successfully collected at the 1 and 5 year clinic visits and analysis of responses to our parent satisfaction survey evaluating perceptions of the venipuncture procedure. Based on our analysis, we adopted the topical anaesthetic, Ametop Gel (tetracaine hyrdrochloride gel 4%). Rationale for this choice included: vasodilation vs. vasoconstriction, timing of onset, cost effectiveness, and previous experience of team members. Staff training demonstrated consistent ability to prepare and review process with parents before the blood collection event, evident in the number of blood samples successfully collected (35/40 successful collections at the 5 year visits of the pilot vanguard cohort, 87.5%). Parental survey responses indicated satisfaction with use of the topical anesthetic and their child’s comfort with procedure. Minimizing stress and pain during the collection of blood samples in research studies is important to the child’s comfort, parental satisfaction, and subject retention. These factors are critical to the success of any longitudinal study. Our detailed and methodical approach to the planning and execution of venipuncture at the Vancouver site of the CHILD study resulted in greater than 85% success rate in obtaining blood samples at the 1 year clinic visit while achieving high levels of parental satisfaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.032 | 0.041 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".