MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157837974 · doi:10.1017/s1462399407000361

Chemical and pharmacological chaperones as new therapeutic agents

2007· review· en· W2157837974 on OpenAlexaff
Tip W. Loo, David M. Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Reviews in Molecular Medicine · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndoplasmic reticulumChemical chaperoneProtein foldingChaperone (clinical)Cell biologyOrganelleCo-chaperoneEndoplasmic-reticulum-associated protein degradationMutantProtein aggregationComputational biologyBiologyChemistryBiochemistryUnfolded protein responseMedicineGeneHsp90Heat shock protein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proteins that are exported from the cell, or targeted to the cell surface or other organelles, are synthesised and assembled in the endoplasmic reticulum and then delivered to their destinations. Point mutations - the most common cause of human genetic diseases - can inhibit folding and assembly of the protein in the endoplasmic reticulum. The unstable or partially folded mutant protein does not undergo trafficking and is usually rapidly degraded. A potential therapy for protein misfolding is to correct defective protein folding and trafficking using pharmacological chaperones. Pharmacological chaperones are substrates or modulators that appear to function by directly binding to the partially folded biosynthetic intermediate to stabilise the protein and allow it to complete the folding process to yield a functional protein. Initial clinical studies with pharmacological chaperones have successfully reduced clinical symptoms of disease. Therefore, pharmacological chaperones show great promise as a new class of therapeutic agents that can be specifically tailored for a particular genetic disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Reviews in Molecular MedicineSame topicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207