AMPA receptor phosphorylation is selectively regulated by constitutive phospholipase A<sub>2</sub>and 5-lipoxygenase activities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present investigation provides the first indication that constitutive, calcium-independent phospholipase A2 activity (iPLA2) modulates phosphorylation of the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionate (AMPA) subtype of glutamate receptors. Preincubation of frozen-thawed brain sections with two iPLA2 inhibitors, bromoenol lactone (BEL) or palmitoyl trifluoromethyl ketone (PACO), produced a dose-dependent enhancement in phosphorylation at both Ser831 and Ser845 sites on the GluR1 subunit of AMPA receptors. This effect was not associated with changes in phosphorylation at the Ser sites of either the GluR2/3 subunits of AMPA receptors or the NR1 subunits of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, nor was it reproduced by inhibition of the calcium-dependent form of PLA2 activity. These results suggest that the effects of these inhibitors are selective to GluR1 subunits and that they are dependent on iPLA2 activity. The ability of iPLA2 inhibitors to increase GluR1 phosphorylation was mimicked by the 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) inhibitor MK-886, but not by blockers of 12-lipoxygenase (12-LO) or cyclooxygenase. Additional experiments indicated that calcium-mediated truncation of GluR1 subunits was reduced by iPLA2 inhibitors, an effect that was not correlated with overall changes in the distribution of AMPA receptors between intracellular and membrane compartments prepared from whole brain sections. However, quantitative autoradiographic analysis indicated enhanced 3H-AMPA binding to the CA1 stratum radiatum of the hippocampus in BEL-treated sections. Saturation kinetics experiments demonstrated that this binding augmentation was due to an increase in the maximal number of AMPA binding sites. Altogether, our results point to the conclusion that basal iPLA2 activity, through the generation of 5-LO metabolites, regulates AMPA receptor phosphorylation of GluR1 subunits, an effect that might selectively influence the number of membrane receptors in area CA1 of the hippocampus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".