MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158054789 · doi:10.1242/jeb.205.21.3357

Cardiorespiratory adjustments during hypercarbia in rainbow trout<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>are initiated by external CO2receptors on the first gill arch

2002· article· en· W2158054789 on OpenAlexaff
Steve F. Perry, Stephen G. Reid

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypercarbiaBradycardiaCardiorespiratory fitnessAnesthesiaAtropineVentilation (architecture)AnatomyReflexInternal medicineHeart rateChemistryMedicineAcidosisBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experiments were performed to test the hypothesis that the marked ventilatory and cardiovascular responses to hypercarbia in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss arise from specific stimulation of chemoreceptors localised to the first gill arch. This was accomplished by measuring cardiorespiratory variables during acute hypercarbia (20 min at P(CO(2))=8 mmHg; 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) in fish subjected to selective bilateral extirpation of the first gill arch. The cardiovascular responses to hypercarbia in the intact fish included a significant bradycardia (from 75.0+/-1.6 to 69.0+/-2.0 beats min(-1); means +/- S.E.M.; N=16), an increase in dorsal aortic blood pressure (from 30.8+/-1.5 to 41.9+/-2.5 mmHg; N=16) and a rise in systemic vascular resistance (from 1.1+/-0.1 to 1.4+/-0.1 mmHg ml(-1) kg(-1) min(-1); N=16). Removal of the first gill arch or pre-treatment with the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine prevented the hypercarbic bradycardia without affecting the pressure or resistance responses. Correlation analysis, however, revealed shallow but significant inverse relationships between water P(CO(2)) and cardiac frequency in both atropinised (r(2)=0.75) and gill-extirpated (r(2)=0.90) fish, suggesting a direct mild effect of CO(2) on cardiac function. The ventilatory response to hypercarbia in the intact fish consisted of an increase in ventilation amplitude (from 0.62+/-0.06 to 1.0+/-0.13 cm; N=16) with no change in breathing frequency. Removal of the first gill arch lowered resting breathing frequency and prevented the statistically significant elevation of breathing amplitude. Gill extirpation, however, did not totally abolish the positive correlation between water P(CO(2)) and ventilation amplitude (r(2)=0.84), suggesting the presence of additional (although less important) chemoreceptive sites that are not confined to the first gill arch. Plasma catecholamine levels were elevated during hypercarbia, and this response was unaffected by prior gill extirpation. To assess whether the CO(2) chemoreceptors of the first gill arch were sensing water and/or blood P(CO(2)), bolus injections of CO(2)-enriched water or saline were made into the buccal cavity or caudal vein, respectively. Injections of CO(2)-enriched water to preferentially stimulate external receptors evoked catecholamine release and cardiorespiratory responses that closely resembled the responses to hypercarbia. As in hypercarbia, extirpation of the first gill arch prevented the bradycardia and the increase in ventilation amplitude associated with externally injected CO(2)-enriched water. Except for a slight decrease in cardiac frequency (from 73.0+/-2.8 to 70.3+/-3.5 beats min(-1); N=11), injection of CO(2)-enriched saline to preferentially stimulate internal chemoreceptors did not affect any measured variable. Taken together, these data indicate that, in rainbow trout, the bradycardia and hyperventilation associated with hypercarbia are triggered largely by external CO(2) chemoreceptors confined to the first gill arch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BiologySame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207