Functional comparison of renal Na-K-Cl cotransporters between distant species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the shark (sa), two variants of the renal Na-K-Cl cotransporter (saNKCC2A and saNKCC2F) are produced by alternative splicing of the second transmembrane domain (tm(2)). In mammals, these splice variants, as well as a third variant (NKCC2B), are spatially distributed along the thick ascending limb of Henle and exhibit divergent kinetic behaviors. To test whether different tm(2) in saNKCC2 are also associated with different kinetic phenotypes, we examined the ion dependence of (86)Rb influx for shark and rabbit splice variants expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. We found that, in both species, A forms have higher cation affinities than F forms. In regard to Cl affinity, however, the A-F difference was more pronounced in rabbit, and the relationship between transport activity and Cl concentration was not always sigmoidal. These results show that the tm(2) of saNKCC2 is, as in rabbit, important for Cl transport, and they suggest that the ability of the distal NKCC2-expressing segment to extract Cl from the luminal fluid differs among species. We have also found that the renal NKCC2 of distant vertebrates share similar affinities for cations. This finding points to the existence of highly conserved residues that mediate the kinetic behavior of the NKCC2 splice variants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".