Speciation in North American water lilies: evidence for the hybrid origin of the newly discovered Canadian endemic <b><i>Nymphaea loriana</i></b> sp. nov. (Nymphaeaceae) in a past contact zone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Field observations of morphologically intermediate water lilies in central Canada suggested a hybrid origin involving the parents Nymphaea odorata Aiton and Nymphaea leibergii Morong despite the fertile nature of these plants. Sequencing of the nrITS and the plastid rps4–trnT–trnF regions further including all members of the north temperate Nymphaea subg. Nymphaea clade, and samples from other hybrids occurring in North America in the wild, allowed us to determine that individuals of N. leibergii and of N. odorata were the maternal and paternal parents, respectively. Hybrids of New England have all proven to be sterile, are genetically variable, and probably are F1. By comparison, the plants of east-central Saskatchewan and west-central Manitoba are fully fertile and genetically uniform based on ISSR and sequence data. On the basis of this evidence, the latter are here described as a new species, Nymphaea loriana sp. nov., which may have originated during the Holocene climatic optimum about 6000 years ago in a past contact zone of the parents. Further hybrids detected between N. odorata and Nymphaea tetragona Georgi, as well as between N. leibergii and N. tetragona, were always sterile. Gene trees of the temperate clade of Nymphaea converge on a clade of small-flowered water lilies (sect. Chamaenymphaea), including N. leibergii, N. tetragona, and Nymphaea pygmaea. Nuclear ITS further resolves an American clade (Nymphaea mexicana Zucc. – N. odorata) sister to all remaining species. This split into two major subclades also appears in the otherwise less resolved rps4–trnT–trnF tree. Thus the origin of N. loriana is a reticulation between long-separated parental lineages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".