A simple procedure for sulfation and 35S radiolabelling of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) gonyautoxins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A method is described to sulfate PSP toxins at various positions in the molecule and to prepare 35S labelled compounds using H2(35)SO4 in the presence of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC). The 11-sulfates of saxitoxin and neosaxitoxin, known as gonyautoxins, are often the most abundant of the PSP toxins in algae and contaminated shellfish. Receptor site binding and antibody assays based on these analogues should, therefore, better reflect toxicity than those in which saxitoxin is used. Although the specific activity of 35S-gonyautoxins is lower than that of commercially available 3H-saxitoxin, the label is strongly bound and is not lost through proton exchange with water as occurs with tritiated saxitoxin. The labelling procedure is rapid, inexpensive and can be done on a small scale. Sulfate can be removed from the 11-position of GTX's in methanolic-HCl and from the 21-position by mild acid hydrolysis and H2(35)SO4 added in 5-10-fold excess. Addition or exchange occurs rapidly on mixing DCC in dimethylformamide with dry toxin and sulfate. Reaction conditions were optimized and reaction products identified by capillary electrophoresis, autoradiography and ionspray mass spectrometry. Together with methods for selective removal of sulfate, the sulfation reaction provides an additional way to prepare some of the naturally occurring derivatives of saxitoxin, many of which are sulfates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".