GPI-linked endothelial CD14 contributes to the detection of LPS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The inflammatory endothelial response to LPS is critical to the host's surviving a gram-negative bacterial infection. In this study we investigated whether human endothelial cells express the functional coreceptor for LPS, CD14, and most importantly whether it is glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) linked. We also examined whether plasma proteins could reconstitute an LPS response in CD14-inhibited endothelium. RT-PCR- and CD14-specific MAbs demonstrated CD14 expression on primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) but not passaged HUVEC. The amino acid sequence of endothelial CD14 was 99% homologous to CD14 on monocytes. Endothelium responded to relatively low levels of LPS in the absence of plasma, and this was entirely dependent on CD14. Removal of GPI-linked proteins with phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C prevented LPS detection and subsequent protein synthesis (E-selectin expression). Endothelial CD14 was sufficient to initiate functional leukocyte recruitment, an event inhibited by blocking its LPS binding epitope and also by removing CD14 from the endothelial surface. Plasma proteins restored only approximately 30% of the LPS response in CD14-inhibited endothelium. In conclusion, our results strongly support an important role for endothelial membrane CD14 in the activation of endothelium for leukocyte recruitment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it