MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158309936 · doi:10.1175/2009mwr3121.1

Simulation of an Orographic Precipitation Event during IMPROVE-2. Part II: Sensitivity to the Number of Moments in the Bulk Microphysics Scheme

2009· article· en· W2158309936 on OpenAlexafffund
Jason A. Milbrandt, M. K. Yau, Jocelyn Mailhot, Stéphane Bélair, Ron McTaggart‐Cowan

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Weather Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityGLS Industries (Canada)Environment and Climate Change Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
KeywordsPrecipitationOrographic liftMeteorologyOrographyEnvironmental scienceMoment (physics)SnowAtmospheric sciencesSensitivity (control systems)Precipitation typesPhysicsClimatologyGeologyClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This is the second in a series of papers examining the behavior of the Milbrandt–Yau multimoment bulk microphysics scheme for the simulation of the 13–14 December 2001 case of orographically enhanced precipitation observed during the second Improvement of Microphysical Parameterization through Observational Verification Experiment (IMPROVE-2) experiment. The sensitivity to the number of predicted moments of the hydrometeor size spectra in the bulk scheme was investigated. The triple-moment control simulations presented in Part I were rerun using double- and single-moment configurations of the multimoment scheme as well the single-moment Kong–Yau scheme. Comparisons of total precipitation and in-cloud hydrometeor mass contents were made between the simulations and observations, with the focus on a 2-h quasi-steady period of heavy stratiform precipitation. The double- and triple-moment simulations were similar; both had realistic precipitation fields, though generally overpredicted in quantity, and had overprediction of snow mass and an underprediction of cloud water aloft. Switching from the triple- to single-moment configuration resulted in a simulation with a precipitation pattern shifted upwind and with a larger positive bias, but with hydrometeor mass fields that corresponded more closely to the observations. Changing the particular single-moment scheme used had a greater impact than changing the number of moments predicted in the same scheme, with the Kong–Yau simulations greatly overpredicting the total precipitation in the lee side of the mountain crest and producing too much snow aloft. Further sensitivity tests indicated that the leeside overprediction in the Kong–Yau runs was most likely due to the combination of the absence of the latent heat effect term in the diffusional growth rate for snow combined with the assumption of instantaneous snow melting in the scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Weather ReviewSame topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207