Cutaneous Langerhans cell histiocytosis in children under one year
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical course and outcome of infants with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) involving skin and to estimate the incidence of progression to multi-system (M-S) disease in those with isolated skin involvement. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 22 LCH patients who were younger than 12 months at the onset of their skin eruption. RESULTS: Twelve patients had isolated skin involvement at diagnosis and 10 were evaluable for progression. Four of the 10 (40%) evaluable patients progressed to multi-system (M-S) disease. Of the 10 patients with M-S disease at diagnosis, 5 had a history of a preceding skin eruption 2 to 13 months prior to diagnosis. Eleven of the 14 (79%) patients with M-S disease had risk organ involvement. The mortality rate of M-S disease was 50%. CONCLUSIONS: It is important for primary caregivers to recognize that isolated cutaneous LCH in infants is not always a benign disorder. The diagnosis of self-healing cutaneous LCH should only be made in retrospect. Careful, albeit non-invasive, follow-up is recommended to monitor for disease progression and development of long-term complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".