R. Eagles, <i>Francophilia in English Society, 1748-1815</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ecent historiography has dealt more frequently with the role of France in the identity formation of Modern Britain.Norman Hampson, for example, focuses on the early 1790s as pivotal to French and English identity formations in The Perfidity of Albion.In 1789, the French idealized English institutions, but became disillusioned over equivocal English support in the Revolution.Hampson argues that this was mirrored by English disgust over the trajectory of the Revolution. 1 Eagles continues the debate on English national identities, but her Francophilia in English Society employs a broader scope.The work spans the period from the end of the War of Austrian Succession in 1748, occasionally dipping toward 1688, and forward toward the Bourbon Restoration in France.Chiefly, Eagles' book is a highly successful attempt to counter the dominant focus, the development of English identity, merely in reaction to France.For Eagles, "No … fixed concepts [either of "Britishness" or "Englishness"] existed in the eighteenth century, and aristocratic Francophilia, and cosmopolitanism were … dominant in the years leading up to the French Revolution."National identity in reaction to France, Eagles cautions, was a trend of the late 1700s among the Protestant, commercial "middling sorts," as Gerald Newman also argues. 2 Yet, Eagles shows that France remained central to English society, especially for the aristocracy, and later in the century, for Newman's middling sorts also. 3 Eagles' is a thematic approach, dealing first with satirical
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".