MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158359057 · doi:10.4319/lo.2001.46.4.0976

Epilithic nitrogen fixation in the rocky littoral zones of Lake Malawi, Africa

2001· article· en· W2158359057 on OpenAlex
Scott N. Higgins, Robert E. Hecky, William D. Taylor

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology and Oceanography · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersDepartment for International Development
KeywordsLittoral zoneNitrogen fixationEpilimnionNutrientEnvironmental scienceFixation (population genetics)EcologyNitrogenBiologyEutrophicationChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rates of epilithic N 2 fixation in the rocky littoral zones of Lake Malawi, determined by in situ incubations and the acetylene reduction method, declined with depth, were highly correlated to light intensity and heterocyst biovolume, and are among the highest observed values for freshwater or marine systems. Daytime N 2 fixation rates were similar between sites at similar depths, except at sediment and nutrient impacted sites, where rates were lower and more variable. Daytime N 2 fixation rates were measurable in all transparent chambers and were negligible in opaque chambers, which indicates that phototrophic diazotrophs (organisms capable of utilizing atmospheric nitrogen) were responsible for all day‐time N 2 fixation. Nocturnal N 2 fixation was ~60% of daytime fixation. A model that integrated N 2 fixation over depth and time predicted that epilithic N 2 fixation may contribute up to 35% of N inputs to the epilimnion of Lake Malawi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it