Nucleopolyhedroviruses of forest and western tent caterpillars: cross‐infectivity and evidence for activation of latent virus in high‐density field populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. 1. Cyclic population dynamics of forest caterpillars are often associated with epizootics of nucleopolyhedrovirus, but it is not known how these viruses persist between generations or through the fluctuations in host population density. 2. To explore the question of virus persistence at different phases of the population cycle, the nucleopolyhedroviruses of two species of tent caterpillar that co‐occur in British Columbia, Canada, Malacosoma californicum pluviale (western tent caterpillar) and Malacosoma disstria (forest tent caterpillar), were characterised. The cross‐infectivity of the viruses in these two host species was investigated to determine whether there might be a route for virus persistence via the alternative host species. Any virus produced in the cross‐infections was characterised to confirm true cross‐infection or to ascertain whether cross‐inoculation triggered latent virus persisting within the population. 3. The virus associated with forest tent caterpillars (MadiNPV) did not infect western tent caterpillars from low‐density populations, nor did it trigger a latent virus infection; however, inoculation of forest tent caterpillars from high‐density populations with virus from western tent caterpillars (McplNPV) resulted in viral infection, but without a dose–response relationship. 4. Analysis of DNA profiles of virus resulting from cross‐infection of the forest tent caterpillar with McplNPV, revealed that 88% of these infections were caused by MadiNPV rather than McplNPV; however the virus from all 44 infected individuals was identical and differed in DNA profile from the stock MadiNPV used for cross‐infection. This suggests strongly that forest tent caterpillars from high‐density field populations harbour a latent, persistent, or sublethal form of MadiNPV that was triggered by exposure to nucleopolyhedrovirus from the western tent caterpillar. 5. Virus was not activated in western tent caterpillars collected over 2 years of late population decline and the first year of population increase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".