MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158375910 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.012002

Decay of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>3770</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math>to light hadrons

2006· article· lv· W2158375910 on OpenAlexaff
G. S. Adams, Mark Anderson, J. P. Cummings, I. Dankó, J. Napolitano, Q. He, H. Muramatsu, C. S. Park, E. H. Thorndike, T. E. Coan, Yang Gao, F. Liu, M. Artuso, C. Boulahouache, S. Blusk, J. Butt, O. Dorjkhaidav, J. Li, N. Menaa, R. Mountain, R. Nandakumar, K. Randrianarivony, R. Redjimi, R. Sia, T. Skwarnicki, S. Stone, J. C. Wang, K. Zhang, S. E. Csorna, G. Bonvicini, D. Cinabro, M. Dubrovin, A. Lincoln, R. A. Briere, G. P. Chen, J. Chen, T. Ferguson, G. Tatishvili, H. Vogel, M. E. Watkins, J. L. Rosner, N. E. Adam, J. Alexander, K. Berkelman, D. G. Cassel, V. Credé, J. E. Duboscq, K. M. Ecklund, R. Ehrlich, L. Fields, R. S. Galik, L. Gibbons, B. Gittelman, R. Gray, S. W. Gray, D. L. Hartill, B. K. Heltsley, D. Hertz, C. D. Jones, J. Kandaswamy, D. L. Kreinick, В. Е. Кузнецов, H. Mahlke-Krüger, T. O. Meyer, P. U. E. Onyisi, D. Peterson, E. A. Phillips, J. Pivarski, D. Riley, A. Rýd, A. J. Sadoff, H. Schwarthoff, X. Shi, M. R. Shepherd, S. Stroiney, W. Sun, D. Urner, T. Wilksen, K. M. Weaver, M. Weinberger, S. B. Athar, P. Avery, L. Breva-Newell, R. Patel, V. Potlia, H. Stoeck, J. Yelton, P. Rubin, C. Cawlfield, B. I. Eisenstein, G. D. Gollin, I. Karliner, D. Kim, N. Lowrey, P. Naik, C. Sedlack, M. Selen, E. J. White, J. S. Williams, J. Wiss, D. M. Asner, K. W. Edwards, D. Besson, T. K. Pedlar, D. Cronin-Hennessy, K. Y. Gao, D. T. Gong, J. Hietala, Y. Kubota, T. Klein, B. W. Lang, S. Z. Li, R. Poling, A. W. Scott, A. Smith, S. Dobbs, Z. Metreveli, K. K. Seth, A. Tomaradze, P. Zweber, J. Ernst, H. Severini, S. Dytman, W. A. Love, S. Mehrabyan, J. Mueller, V. Savinov, Z. Li, A. Lopez, H. Méndez, G. S. Huang, D. H. Miller, V. Pavlunin, B. Sanghi, I. P. J. Shipsey

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2006
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a search for $\ensuremath{\psi}(3770)$ decay to two-body non-$D\overline{D}$ final states in ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ data produced by the CESR collider and analyzed with the CLEO-c detector. Vector-pseudoscalar production ${\ensuremath{\rho}}^{0}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$, ${\ensuremath{\rho}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$, $\ensuremath{\omega}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$, $\ensuremath{\phi}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$, $\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\eta}$, $\ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\eta}$, $\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\eta}$, $\ensuremath{\rho}{\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, $\ensuremath{\omega}{\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, $\ensuremath{\phi}{\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, ${K}^{*0}\overline{{K}^{0}}$, and ${K}^{*+}{K}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ is studied along with that of ${b}_{1}\ensuremath{\pi}$ (${b}_{1}^{0}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$ and ${b}_{1}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$) and ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$. The largest amount of disagreement between the expected rate for ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\gamma}}^{*}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}X$ and that for ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}X$ at $\sqrt{s}=3.773\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$ is found for $X=\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\eta}$, at an excess cross section of $(2.4\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.6)\text{ }\mathrm{pb}$ [${\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{\psi}(3770)}=(7.4\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.6)\text{ }\mathrm{keV}$], and a suggestive suppression is seen for ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$ and $\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\pi}$. We conclude with form factor determinations for $\ensuremath{\omega}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$, $\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\eta}$, and $\ensuremath{\rho}{\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmologySame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207