MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158394713 · doi:10.3382/ps.2009-00309

Standardized ileal amino acid digestibility in wheat distillers dried grains with solubles for broilers

2009· article· en· W2158394713 on OpenAlexaff
Arash Bandegan, W. Guenter, D. Hoehler, G. H. Crow, C. M. Nyachoti

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroilerCHROMIC OXIDEStarterChemistryFood scienceAnimal scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study was conducted to estimate the ileal digestibility of amino acids (AA) in 5 different samples of wheat distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) fed to broilers. Two hundred sixteen male Ross broiler chicks were fed a commercial starter diet from d 1 to 15 of age followed by the test diets from d 15 to 21. The 5 test diets consisted of a DDGS sample or wheat as the sole source of AA, dextrose, minerals, and vitamins. Chromic oxide (0.3%) was included in all diets as a digestibility marker. Each test diet was randomly assigned to 6 replicate cages, each with 6 birds. On d 21, birds were killed to sample ileal digesta for determining the apparent (AID) and standardized (SID) ileal AA digestibilities. The SID values were calculated using ileal endogenous AA losses previously determined in our laboratory. Among the indispensable AA in wheat DDGS, the lowest and highest AID average values were observed for Lys (35.6%) and Phe (79.2%), respectively. The most variable AID estimates of wheat DDGS samples were observed for Lys (24.4 to 45.7%), Thr (48.2 to 60.9%), and His (57.4 to 69.1%) as indispensable and Asp (32.5 to 50.9%), Gly (49.6 to 63.1%), and Ala (53.6 to 66.8%) as dispensable AA, respectively. Apparent ileal digestibility estimates of the wheat sample for Lys, Thr, His, Gly, and Ala were 77.5, 74, 83.6, 79.3, and 78.9%, respectively. All AA digestibility estimates for both AID and SID determined in wheat were higher than in wheat DDGS samples (P < 0.05). Considering both AID and SID coefficients of wheat DDGS samples, Lys was the least digestible AA, averaging 35.6 and 40.0%, respectively. Using SID values in practical diet formulation can increase accuracy, prevent overformulation of diets, and reduce cost of safety margins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207