Cold marine indicators of the late Quaternary: the new dinoflagellate cyst genus <i>Islandinium</i> and related morphotypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Round, brown, spiny dinoflagellate cysts characterise many modern high‐latitude assemblages. Abundance is often highest where summer sea‐surface temperatures seldom exceed 7 °C and where winter sea‐surface temperatures are around 0 °C, making this morphological group important for reconstructing cold intervals within marine Quaternary sequences. Our analysis of modern sediments from the Beaufort Sea of Arctic Canada, the Kara and Laptev seas of Arctic Russia, and across the Arctic Ocean, allows us to recognise the new cyst genus Islandinium along with the extant species Islandinium minutum (Harland and Reid in Harland et al ., 1980 ) new combination (basionym: Multispinula? minuta ), Islandinium? cezare (de Vernal et al ., 1989 ex de Vernal in Rochon et al ., 1999) new status and combination (basionym: Multispinula? minuta var. cezare ) sensu lato , and Echinidinium karaense new species. Of these, the generotype Islandinium minutum is a well‐known but morphologically problematic species. We have re‐examined the type material from the Beaufort Sea and studied specimens from across the Arctic, and our observations clarify ambiguities in the original description of this species. The archeopyle of Islandinium minutum results from the loss of three apical plates, an unusual style among peridiniphycidean dinoflagellates. The asymmetrical location of these plates around the apex is distinctive, and probably contributed to earlier misunderstandings of the archeopyle. Previous attributions to Multispinula? and Algidasphaeridium? are unsustainable. Maps showing the distribution of Islandinium minutum are given for the Northern Hemisphere and show this species to be polar to north‐temperate, whereas Islandinium? cezare s.l. and Echinidinium karaense appear to be more restricted to polar environments. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".