MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158521269 · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.targ-09-b51

Abstract B51: A phase I dose-escalation study of MGCD265 in patients with advanced malignancies (study 265-102)

2009· article· en· W2158521269 on OpenAlexaff
Patricia LoRusso, Razelle Kurzrock, Amy Weise, Elisabeth I. Heath, Michel Drouin, Manuela Juretic, Christiane R. Maroun, Andre Karam, Mariam Mehran, Jeffrey M. Besterman, Robert E. Martell, Jennifer J. Wheler

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsPyrogenesis (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCohortNeutropeniaToxicityInternal medicineGastroenterologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: MethylGene has developed a small molecule inhibitor, MGCD265, that inhibits c-Met, Ron, all three members of VEGFR family and Tie-2, thereby inhibiting multiple pathways involved in tumor growth, metastasis and angiogenesis. The primary objectives of this study are to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the safety profile of MGCD265 administered with interruption to patients with advanced malignancies. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, dose escalation study of oral MGCD265 administered once daily on a 1 week on/1 week off schedule of each 28-day cycle. Cohorts of 3–4 patients were enrolled per dose level, initially with dose doubling between cohorts, followed by smaller increments once grade 2 drug-related toxicity was observed. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: grade 4 neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, any ≥ grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, severe/sustained hypertension or any toxic effect leading to a patient missing ≥ 4 doses of MGCD265. Treatment continued until disease progression or toxicity. Response, as a secondary objective, was assessed every 2 cycles by RECIST criteria. Results: Twenty patients (20) have been recruited to date: 4 patients in cohort 24 mg/m2; 4 patients in cohort 48 mg/m2; 3 patients in cohort 96 mg/m2; 3 patients in cohort 192 mg/m2; 3 patients in cohort 255 mg/m2; and 3 patients in cohort 340 mg/m2. The overall age range is 40 to 72 years and the gender distribution among the cohorts is 13 female to 7 male patients. No DLTs have been observed to date but grade 2 adverse events (AE) considered at least possibly related to the treatment included diarrhea (n=2), nausea (n=1) and intermittent dizziness (n=1). No grade 3 or higher drug-related AE have been reported. To date, 5 patients have experienced stable disease per RECIST. One patient with a sarcomatoid bladder cancer (dosed at 96 mg/m2), who was progressing prior to study entry, has been treated for 12 cycles. An archived biopsy obtained prior to MGCD265 treatment from this patient shows c-Met expression and autophosphorylation. One patient with medullary thyroid cancer experienced tumor shrinkage (−10%). Conclusions: To date, intermittent administration of MGCD265 was found to be well tolerated with preliminary signs of activity. Recruitment of additional cohorts is underway. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):B51.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207