MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158544821 · doi:10.4141/s99-040

Indicator of risk of water contamination by P for Soil Landscape of Canada polygons

2000· article· en· W2158544821 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Martin A. Bolinder, R. R. Simard, Suzanne Beauchemin, K. B. MacDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManureEnvironmental scienceFertilizerAgriculturePolygon (computer graphics)ContaminationHydrology (agriculture)GeographyAgronomyEcologyGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The indicator of risk of water contamination (IROWC) is a component of the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agri-Environmental Indicator project. The IROWC measures progress in reducing the risk of water contamination from agricultural activities, focusing on N and P. The objective of this study was to propose a methodology for an IROWC-P applicable at the Soil Landscape of Canada (SLC) polygon level (1:1 000 000 map scale) using an indexing approach. The sources of data included Census of Agriculture, SLC and soil survey databases and provincial soil test data. The IROWC-P considers the following site characteristics: soil erosion and potential for overland flow, annual P balance (crop residues, manure and inorganic fertilizer), soil test P (STP) and degree of soil P saturation (DSPS). IROWC-P classifies polygons for their potential risk of P transfer to surface waters according to five vulnerability classes (i.e., very low, low, medium, high and very high). The methodology was tested on a pilot basis for selected SLC polygons in the province of Quebec using 1981 and 1991 census data. Preliminary results indicated that the proposed methodology showed some sensitivity to changes in agricultural practices between 1981 and 1991 and reflected differences in risk of P contamination from areas of intensive compared to areas of extensive agriculture. The difference between the selected areas was mainly attributed to the STP, DSPS, manure and inorganic fertilizer P polygon characteristics. The temporal variations in the IROWC-P ratings were attributed mainly to the manure and inorganic fertilizer P polygon characteristics. Key words: Degree of soil P saturation, soil P index, environmental risk, soil test P

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207