An Important Proportion of Genital Samples Submitted for <i>Chlamydia trachomatis</i> Detection by PCR Contain Small Amounts of Cellular DNA as Measured by β-Globin Gene Amplification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We assessed the quality of genital samples submitted for Chlamydia trachomatis detection by PCR by a second PCR assay for the presence of human beta-globin DNA. Endocervical and urethral samples were first tested by the COBAS AMPLICOR C. trachomatis assay (Roche Diagnostic Systems) with an internal control and were then amplified for the presence of beta-globin DNA with primers PC04 and GH20. Samples that contained inhibitors were retested after dilution 1:10. A total of 407 genital samples (311 endocervical swabs from 311 women and 96 urethral swabs from 95 men and 1 woman) collected over a 1-month period were evaluated. The internal control could not be amplified, despite dilution, from 3 of 23 samples that were retested after dilution because of inhibition, leaving 404 samples that could be analyzed by PCR. Eleven samples tested positive for C. trachomatis. Thirty (7.4%) of the 404 samples were negative for beta-globin. Twelve of the 23 undiluted samples that contained inhibitors tested positive for beta-globin DNA. Amplification of beta-globin DNA in samples submitted for C. trachomatis detection by the COBAS AMPLICOR C. trachomatis assay demonstrated that an important proportion of the samples did not contain cellular DNA. Assessment of the quality of the samples for PCR analysis by beta-globin amplification is feasible but cannot replace use of the internal control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".