Rheology and extrusion foaming of chain‐branched poly(lactic acid)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study, the effect of macromolecular chain‐branching on poly(lactic acid) (PLA) rheology, crystallization, and extrusion foaming was investigated. Two PLA grades, an amorphous and a semi‐crystalline one, were branched using a multifunctional styrene‐acrylic‐epoxy copolymer. The branching of PLA and its foaming were achieved in one‐step extrusion process. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), in concentration up to 9%, was used as expansion agent to obtain foams from the two PLA branched using chain‐extender contents up to 2%. The foams were investigated with respect to their shear and elongational behavior, crystallinity, morphology, and density. The addition of the chain‐extender led to an increase in complex viscosity, elasticity, elongational viscosity, and in the manifestation of the strain‐hardening phenomena. Low‐density foams were obtained at 5–9% CO 2 for semi‐crystalline PLA and only at 9% CO 2 in the case of the amorphous PLA. Differences in foaming behavior were attributed to crystallites formation during the foaming process. The rheological and structural changes associated with PLA chain‐extension lowered the achieved crystallinity but slightly improved the foamability at low CO 2 content. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it