MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158744964

Prognostic value of human kallikrein 10 expression in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

2001· article· en· W2158744964 on OpenAlexaff
Liu‐Ying Luo, Dionyssios Katsaros, Andreas Scorilas, S. Fracchioli, R. Piccinno, Irene A. Rigault de la Longrais, David Howarth, Eleftherios P. Diamandis

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvarian cancerOvaryKallikreinOvarian carcinomaSerous fluidOvarian tumorPathologyBiologyInternal medicineCancerCancer researchMedicineOncology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Human kallikrein 10 (hK10; also known as the normal epithelial cell-specific 1 gene and protein) is a secreted serine protease, which belongs to the human kallikrein family. It has been reported that hK10 is down-regulated in breast and prostate cancer cell lines and that it may function as a tumor suppressor. Recently, we developed a highly sensitive and specific immunoassay for hK10 and found that this protein is abundantly expressed in ovarian tissue. In this study, we measured quantitatively hK10 levels in ovarian cancer cytosolic extracts and evaluated the prognostic value of this biomarker in ovarian cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Specimens from eight normal ovarian tissues, eight ovarian tissues with benign disease, and 182 ovarian tumors were investigated. RESULTS: hK10 concentration in ovarian tumor cytosols ranged from 0 to 84 ng/mg of total protein, with a median of 2.6. This median was highly elevated in comparison with normal and benign ovarian tissues (P < 0.001). A cutoff of 1.35 ng/mg was selected to categorize tumors as hK10 high and hK10 low. With chi(2) test and Fisher's exact test, high concentration hK10 was found to be associated with advanced disease stage, serous histological type, suboptimal debulking, and large residual tumor (>1 cm; all P < 0.05). hK10 status was additionally correlated with clinical outcome, including progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the Cox model. In univariate analysis, we found that patients with hK10 high tumors were more likely to die and relapse, in comparison with patients with hK10 low tumors (hazards ratios for PFS and OS were 1.93 and 2.42, respectively; P < 0.05). Although this correlation disappeared after the entire patient population was subjected to multivariate analysis, it remained significant in the subgroup of patients with stage III/IV ovarian cancer (hazards ratios for PFS and OS were 1.98 and 2.12, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that hK10 is a new, independent, unfavorable prognostic marker, especially for late-stage ovarian cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and AngioedemaFrench-language works237,207