Effect of female sex hormones on <i>Campylobacter rectus</i> and human gingival fibroblasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies have suggested a relationship between maternal Campylobacter rectus infections and preterm low birth weight. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of female sex hormones, estradiol and progesterone, on C. rectus and human gingival fibroblasts (HGF). The growth of C. rectus was significantly enhanced by incorporating either estradiol or progesterone in the culture medium. The production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 by HGF increased following stimulation with estradiol or progesterone, at concentrations comparable to those present in the plasma of pregnant women. In addition, a significantly higher secretion of VEGF by HGF treated with the combination of C. rectus and estradiol was observed in comparison with a treatment with C. rectus alone. Stimulation of HGF with VEGF resulted in production of IL-6 and IL-8 in a dose-dependent manner. The capacity of female sex hormones to enhance both C. rectus growth and VEGF, IL-6, and IL-8 production by HGF has the potential to contribute to periodontal disease progression during pregnancy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".