Is There a Need for Screening for Type 2 Diabetes in Seventh Graders?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine if a screening program for type 2 diabetes in a seventh-grade population is warranted as well as to increase health care providers' awareness of the need for this screening. DATA SOURCES: We sent a diabetes questionnaire to each participant's parent or guardian. The questionnaire assessed for any family history of diabetes, any currently diagnosed participant with diabetes, and physical activity. Each participant was also assessed for age, ethnicity, gender, and acanthosis nigricans and received a one-time blood pressure reading. The researchers obtained height and weight by utilizing each school's weight/height scale and calculated each participant's body mass index (BMI). CONCLUSIONS: Overall results determined that there is a need for screening for type 2 diabetes in a seventh-grade population. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The role of the nurse practitioner (NP) is to increase health professionals' and the public's awareness of risk factors related to adolescents and type 2 diabetes by patient education both in areas of health promotion and disease prevention. NP-directed educational programs could include diabetic education in health classes in cooperation with the school nurse and/or health teacher and community-based diabetic forums addressing this topic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".