Postural Control Mechanisms During Quiet Standing in Patients With Diabetic Sensory Neuropathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to compare postural mechanisms identified by using dual force platform in healthy elderly community-dwelling subjects and diabetic sensory neuropathy (DSN) patients under different visual conditions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The presence and the severity of the sensory neuropathy was evaluated with a clinical scale. Postural mechanisms and motor strategies of the ankle and hip joints were quantified by testing subjects in quiet stance on a dual force platform under two visual conditions (eyes open and eyes closed). Root mean square (RMS) values of the center of pressure (COP) time-varying signals and normalized cross-correlation function were used to estimate the contribution and the interdependence of postural control mechanisms. RESULTS: DSN patients show larger RMS values of the COP(net) displacement in both anteroposterior and mediolateral (ML) directions. Motor strategies at the ankle joints are altered in DSN patients compared with healthy elderly subjects particularly in the ML direction. CONCLUSIONS: This experiment is the first to highlight that even with vision, postural mechanisms at the ankle joints are impaired in DSN patients during quiet standing. Our results point out the importance of focusing on postural control instability in ML of DSN patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".