MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158876809 · doi:10.1542/peds.2009-3010

The Influence of Family Characteristics on Perinatal Decision Making

2011· article· en· W2158876809 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kirstie R. Marcello, John L Stefano, Kim Lampron, Keith J. Barrington, Amy Mackley, Annie Janvier

Bibliographic record

VenuePEDIATRICS · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineResuscitationGestationIntervention (counseling)Best interestsAffect (linguistics)PediatricsFamily medicinePregnancyNursingEmergency medicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether parental characteristics affect estimates of best interests and intervention decisions for preterm infants. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study consisted of an anonymous questionnaire given to nurses, physicians, and students. The study included scenarios of 3 sets of parents, including a 16-year-old teenager, a couple who were lawyers, and a couple with a history of in vitro fertilization, about to deliver at 22 5/7 weeks, 24 weeks, or 27 5/7 weeks. Respondents were asked whether active intervention is in the infant's best interests and whether they would comply with family decisions. RESULTS: A total of 1105 questionnaires were sent out, with 829 respondents in Canada and the United States. At 22 5/7 weeks' gestation, 21% of the respondents thought that resuscitation was in the infant's best interest; among respondents who did not agree, 59% would intervene if the parents wished. At 27 5/7 weeks' gestation, 95% of respondents thought that resuscitation was in the infant's best interest, yet 34% would accept comfort care. Estimates of best interest, and willingness to comply, varied significantly by parental characteristics. At 22 5/7 weeks' gestation, 17% of respondents believed that resuscitation was in the best interest of the teenaged mother's infant compared with 26% of respondents who believed that resuscitation was in the best interest for the infants of the others; this difference persisted at 24 weeks. At 22 5/7 and at 24 weeks' gestation, compliance with active care despite believing that it not in the infant's best interest was significantly more frequent for the in vitro fertilization couple and the lawyers than for the teenaged mother. At 27 weeks' gestation, more than 93% of respondents complied for all parents. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers frequently are ready to intervene actively, or not, despite believing that it is against the infant's best interest. Willingness to do so varies according to parental characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEDIATRICSSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207